Part of Discipleship

WDBRT-HomosexualityResisting sexual desire is a part of discipleship for every Christian, no matter our marital status and no matter the kinds of attractions we experience. Desire must never be given the priority over obedience. Intense longing does not turn sinful wrongs into civil rights.

– Kevin DeYoung in What Does The Bible Really Teach About Homosexuality

Current

Here are some interesting posts to help us think through the continued sexual revolution – especially as it played out in Indiana a few weeks ago.

The New Intolerance – Mary Eberstadt (First Things)

The End of Tolerance and Enforced Morality – Ben Domenech (The Federalist)

Indiana Shows the Left Has No Concept of Freedom – Robert Tracinski (The Federalist)

Love and Hate in a Foreign Country – Carl Trueman (First Things)

Must Christianity Change Its Sexual Ethics? History May Hold The Key – Trevin Wax (Religion News Service)

Sermon Songs: Isaiah 54

MusicNotes

We are now children of joy
Every Christian girl and boy
God our Father to enjoy
Hallelujah what a Savior

His redeeming work is done
Freedom from our shame is won
Resting in His compassion
Hallelujah what a Savior

We are clothed in his beauty
Ever righteous we will be
In Him our security
Hallelujah what a Savior

– From a sermon on Isaiah 54
(To the tune of the “Hallelujah What A Savior”)

Break the Trend

BecomingWorldlySaintsHave you noticed a trend? The thing we hope is going to make us happy always lies just beyond our grasp. We are temporarily thrilled when we finally get it, but soon we realize that wasn’t it, and we’re off in pursuit of the next big thing. When will we learn? If everything until now hasn’t delivered the satisfaction it promised, why would we think the next thing will? …The only thing that was ever meant to satisfy you is God.

– Michael Wittmer in Becoming Worldly Saints

Stand Firm In His Love

“…but with great compassion I will gather you….
…with everlasting love I will have compassion on you,”
says the LORD, your Redeemer.
“For the mountains may depart and the hills be removed,
but my steadfast love shall not depart from you,
and my covenant of peace shall not be removed,”
says the LORD, who has compassion on you.
– Isaiah 54:7-8, 10

God offers us great compassion. Not just a little. Not just some. Not just the leftovers. God offers us great compassion.

God shows us everlasting love. Not just occasional love. Not just temporary love. Not just conditional love. God shows us everlasting love.

On the cross he showed that love. And on the cross he paid the price to bring us peace with God (53:5). And this covenant of peace cannot be removed, it cannot be cancelled, it cannot be annulled.

And so, even if the mountains and hills in all their stability were to disappear, he will not remove his love from us. He will yet have compassion upon us. Because of Jesus, nothing can separate us from his great compassion and everlasting love.  So stand firm in his love.

Stop fretting that you will somehow lose his love – it cannot be removed.

Stop working, trying desperately to earn his love – he already loves you.

Stop grumbling about your life as though he doesn’t love you.

Stop sinning against this God who loves you so much.

Stop caring what world thinks of you – what does it matter if God himself loves you.

Stop looking for love in all the other places our world looks for love – you have already found the fountain of all love.

So stand firm in God’s love.  Rest in his everlasting love & his great compassion.

The God of universe loves you.

So stand firm in his love.

Passion Points

Here are some good posts for your weekend reading:

“May I Go In There?” – Jared Wilson

5 Resurrection Realities That Reorient Our Evangelism – Steven Lee (TGC)

5 Reasons to Rejoice in Persecution – Tim Challies

Don’t Follow Your Heart – Jon Bloom (DG)

Hope you have a great Lord’s Day following your Lord who died and rose again so you might draw near to Him!

Missions Focused Small Church: Be Strategic

Two weeks ago, we began by considering the need to get focused – and to create a missions team to do just that. Today, we want to consider the need to be strategic. Three thoughts to consider:

  • Power of One (or Two) – A small church has limited finances and people, and people have limited time. Life is busy, and the more missionaries you have, the harder it will be for the people in your church to become familiar with any of the missionaries. So consider the power of one or two. Instead of trying to support lots of missionaries, choose only one or two missionaries. Maybe focus on one area of the world. Then keep those few missionaries in front of the people all of the time. Read their reports and pray for them each week in the worship service. Do special projects for them (more on that in a few weeks). Consider a missions trip. In other words, develop the relationship. You can’t develop close bonds with lots of missionaries, but you can with just a few. So consider the power of one or two.
  • Purpose – Consider your purpose. What is your purpose in missions? For our church the purpose is evangelism, church planting, discipleship, and leadership training. All of our missionaries are involved in many or all of these purposes. There are a lot of people going on the field as support staff – accountants, etc. That might be great for a larger church that has the funds for a broader missionary focus. Or maybe support is the heartbeat of your small church. If so, that’s great. Just stay focused on your purpose.
  • Prioritize Gospel Need – Ask the question: where is the gospel absent? Many countries now have numerous churches that can continue to reach their own country for Christ. Not that continued missionary assistance might not be beneficial, but what about countries with no gospel presence? That might include unreached tribes, distant villages, or countries that are not favorable to the gospel. One of the missionaries we support is in an area with little gospel presence, and that was by design. So consider where the gospel is absent, and prioritize gospel need.

I’d love to get your thoughts and ideas – just leave a comment.

Next week, we will consider suggestions on choosing missionaries.

No Little Mistake

WDBRT-HomosexualityThe fact that Paul singles out homosexual relations as a conspicuous example of the human heart suppressing the truth and turning from God suggests that we must not soft-pedal as no big deal what the Bible underlines as particularly egregious rebellion. And it means we must face squarely the serious indictment God’s Word levies against the individuals and churches that “give approval to those who practice them” (v. 32). It is no little mistake in God’s eyes to encourage and support what harms our fellow creatures and dishonors our Creator.

– Kevin DeYoung on Romans 1 in What Does The Bible Really Teach About Homosexuality

Current: Indiana RFRA

By now you must have heard about Indiana’s new RFRA law, but if you listen to the media’s portrayal, you probably think it has to do with discriminating against homosexuals. But of course, it really has nothing to do with discrimination, and everything to do with protecting our religious freedom. Joe Carter has a helpful post that summarizes What You Should Know About Religious Freedom Restoration Acts.  If you want the quick version, check out this helpful visual.  Even some, like Stephen Prothero and Douglas Laycock, who support same-sex marriage argue that that the law is not about discrimination but religious freedom. In Laycock’s words:

The critical fact with respect to all the hysteria over Indiana is this: No one has ever won an exemption from a discrimination law under a RFRA standard. Few have tried, and none have won. There is absolutely no basis in experience for the charge that these laws are a license to discriminate.

Despite having nothing to do with discrimination, many called for boycotting the state of Indiana. Aaron Earls points out that If You Are Boycotting Indiana, Here’s Where Else You Need to Boycott – including many other states with similar laws, our country with a similar federal law, and many other nations with much less friendly attitudes toward homosexuality.  But as Earls points out again, the laws really have nothing to do with homosexuality, and everything to do with religious freedom.  So boycotting Indiana really means one is opposing religious freedom.

And one wonders if that isn’t, after all, the point. How do we explain all the freaking out over this law that we have recently witnessed? Did the media and many political leaders, business leaders, entertainment leaders, and sports leaders simply act out of total ignorance of what the law says (raising serious questions of their competence)?  Or is there a growing opposition to religious freedom that the law seeks to protect?

Albert Mohler points to recent editorials in both The Washington Post and The New York Times that seek to redefine religious liberty, desire to give the government the right to infringe on religious liberty, or simply demand that religions bow “to the enlightenments of modernity.”

Meanwhile Russell Moore writes:

Many of those leading the discussion of religious freedom have little or no understanding of what motivates religious people…. If one cannot empathize with why defying conscience on a matter of religious exercise is a life-or-death concern, then one is free to impute all sorts of evil motives….  This is particularly problematic when widespread ignorance of religious motivation is joined with a zealotry that can only be called religious: for the stamping out of all dissent against the sexual revolution.

In our culture’s headlong rush toward so called “same-sex marriage,” it seems that many are willing to steamroll right over religious freedom.  Indeed, Frank Turek argues that “Same-Sex Marriage” Is Becoming the Established Religion. He writes:

Forget tolerance. This is well beyond tolerance. Now, if you don’t agree to celebrate same sex marriage, the established religion will commence an inquisition and, without a trial, punish you for heresy. That’s why this legislation is necessary.

So how should the church respond?

First, the church needs to stand firm on the Bible’s teaching on homosexuality and the definition of marriage no matter how unpopular it may be.  We are not in a popularity contest, and we seek to please God, not men.

Second, the church needs to continue to fight for religious freedom. We need to make our case in the public square for the freedom to believe, and to practice what we believe.

Third, the church needs to look past this looming issue, and continue to do what the church is always called to do – love God with all of our being and love our neighbor as ourselves.  Jesus said the world would know we are Christians by our love.  We need to counter our culture’s impression of hate with the true practice of daily love – even toward those who oppose us.

Finally, the church needs to remember what we celebrated only a few days ago.  Our Savior is risen.  He ascended into heaven and reigns at the right hand of the Father.  We need not freak out. The sky is not falling.  Our God is still on the throne.