Current

Here are some recent posts related to religious freedom:

The FAQs: Supreme Court Delivers Religious Liberty Victory to Hospitals – Joe Carter (TGC)

Two U.S. Senators Apply an Anti-Christian Religious Test for Government Officials – Joe Carter (TGC)

East Lansing Farmer’s Market: Isn’t There a Better Way? – Kevin DeYoung

Christian Reflections on Ontario Bill 89 – Steven West (TGC-Canada)

Current Collection

Here are three recent posts related to religious liberty:

Washington Florist Loses Discrimination Case – Bonnie Pritchett (World)

Submit to the New Sexual Orthodoxy or Risk Losing Everything – Denny Burk

Will Trump Defend Religious Liberty Against the LGBT Agenda? – Joe Carter (TGC)

Current: Indiana RFRA

By now you must have heard about Indiana’s new RFRA law, but if you listen to the media’s portrayal, you probably think it has to do with discriminating against homosexuals. But of course, it really has nothing to do with discrimination, and everything to do with protecting our religious freedom. Joe Carter has a helpful post that summarizes What You Should Know About Religious Freedom Restoration Acts.  If you want the quick version, check out this helpful visual.  Even some, like Stephen Prothero and Douglas Laycock, who support same-sex marriage argue that that the law is not about discrimination but religious freedom. In Laycock’s words:

The critical fact with respect to all the hysteria over Indiana is this: No one has ever won an exemption from a discrimination law under a RFRA standard. Few have tried, and none have won. There is absolutely no basis in experience for the charge that these laws are a license to discriminate.

Despite having nothing to do with discrimination, many called for boycotting the state of Indiana. Aaron Earls points out that If You Are Boycotting Indiana, Here’s Where Else You Need to Boycott – including many other states with similar laws, our country with a similar federal law, and many other nations with much less friendly attitudes toward homosexuality.  But as Earls points out again, the laws really have nothing to do with homosexuality, and everything to do with religious freedom.  So boycotting Indiana really means one is opposing religious freedom.

And one wonders if that isn’t, after all, the point. How do we explain all the freaking out over this law that we have recently witnessed? Did the media and many political leaders, business leaders, entertainment leaders, and sports leaders simply act out of total ignorance of what the law says (raising serious questions of their competence)?  Or is there a growing opposition to religious freedom that the law seeks to protect?

Albert Mohler points to recent editorials in both The Washington Post and The New York Times that seek to redefine religious liberty, desire to give the government the right to infringe on religious liberty, or simply demand that religions bow “to the enlightenments of modernity.”

Meanwhile Russell Moore writes:

Many of those leading the discussion of religious freedom have little or no understanding of what motivates religious people…. If one cannot empathize with why defying conscience on a matter of religious exercise is a life-or-death concern, then one is free to impute all sorts of evil motives….  This is particularly problematic when widespread ignorance of religious motivation is joined with a zealotry that can only be called religious: for the stamping out of all dissent against the sexual revolution.

In our culture’s headlong rush toward so called “same-sex marriage,” it seems that many are willing to steamroll right over religious freedom.  Indeed, Frank Turek argues that “Same-Sex Marriage” Is Becoming the Established Religion. He writes:

Forget tolerance. This is well beyond tolerance. Now, if you don’t agree to celebrate same sex marriage, the established religion will commence an inquisition and, without a trial, punish you for heresy. That’s why this legislation is necessary.

So how should the church respond?

First, the church needs to stand firm on the Bible’s teaching on homosexuality and the definition of marriage no matter how unpopular it may be.  We are not in a popularity contest, and we seek to please God, not men.

Second, the church needs to continue to fight for religious freedom. We need to make our case in the public square for the freedom to believe, and to practice what we believe.

Third, the church needs to look past this looming issue, and continue to do what the church is always called to do – love God with all of our being and love our neighbor as ourselves.  Jesus said the world would know we are Christians by our love.  We need to counter our culture’s impression of hate with the true practice of daily love – even toward those who oppose us.

Finally, the church needs to remember what we celebrated only a few days ago.  Our Savior is risen.  He ascended into heaven and reigns at the right hand of the Father.  We need not freak out. The sky is not falling.  Our God is still on the throne.

Current

The Supreme Court gave their ruling on the Hobby Lobby case today, ruling by a slim majority in favor of religious freedom.  Here are some helpful posts:

First, a news story: Supreme Court rules ObamaCare provision can’t force some employers to cover contraception – Fox News

Second, a quick summary of the case: What You Should Know About the Contraceptive Mandate Decision – Joe Carter (Acton)

Third, a good summary of some major issues: Hobby Lobby and the Liberty of Conscience – Kevin DeYoung

Finally, an analysis: The Supreme Court Agrees with Hobby Lobby, But Your Neighbor Probably Doesn’t – Trevin Wax

While there is reason to celebrate the decision, it is more than a little disconcerting that four justices and much of the population believes a “right” to free birth control should trump the First Amendment right to freedom of religion.

Trevin Wax in his post above also makes a point worth quoting:

Consider this. A generation ago, a person’s religious observance was a public matter, a defining characteristic of one’s identity, while a person’s sexual activity was something private. Today, this situation is reversed. A person’s sexual behavior is now considered a defining characteristic of identity, a public matter to be affirmed (even subsidized) by others, while religious observance is private and personal, relegated to places of worship and not able to infringe upon or impact the public square.

In the midst of this “brave new world” of confused identities and priorities, we as Christians must look to Jesus for our identity.  Serving Him must be our priority.  And no matter what comes, we will find our hope for the future not in rulings or cultural opinions but in the One who reigns over all.

Current

Current: A weekly collection of current news and issues in the church, the country, and the world.

A few weeks ago a federal judge ruled that a pastor’s housing allowance is unconstitutional, which begs the question for many people: what is a pastor’s housing allowance and why do pastors get it?

Also a few weeks ago, our president made a new deal with Iran that failed to secure the release of American citizen Pastor Saeed.  Despite Iran’s outward show of goodwill in other ways, Iran is executing many of its own citizens, and holds at least one other American prisoner.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Hobby Lobby’s case regarding the requirement in the new health care bill for businesses to offer contraceptives – even contraceptives that can cause abortions – regardless of the owner’s religious beliefs.  Rick Garnett writes: Like millions of religious believers and groups, these challengers reject the idea that religious faith and religious freedom are simply about what we believe and how we pray, and not also about how we live, act and work. At the heart of these two cases is the straightforward argument that federal law does not require us to “check our faith at the door” when we pursue vocations in business and commerce.  Meanwhile Trevin Wax affirms that freedom of conscience is a beautiful thing – as it relates to this case and many others.

Passion Ethics

Here are some updates on some important current religious freedom issues:

Saeed Abedini, American pastor jailed in Iran, denied medication, family says – Fox News Iranian jailers have denied crucial medication to Pastor Saeed Abedini, the American citizen imprisoned there for his faith, according to the Idaho resident’s family and legal team.
Here are some ways you can help.

Home School Legal Defense Association Files Romeike v. Holder with U.S. Supreme Court – CrossMap
HSLDA Chairman and principal author of the petition, Michael Farris, said that the Court should intervene for the sake of justice.  “The United States should be a place of asylum for those who are persecuted because of their decision to follow their core religious beliefs,” he said.  “Parents, not the government, decide first how children are educated. Germany’s notorious persecution of families who homeschool violates their own obligations to uphold human rights standards and must end.”
Farris has called for a day of prayer on November 17 in anticipation of the Supreme Court’s November 26 decision on whether to hear this case as well as Hobby Lobby’s case.

Hobby Lobby asks US Supreme Court to take up case over federal birth-control coverage mandate – Fox News
Lawyers for the Oklahoma City-based craft store chain and its sister company, Mardel Christian bookstore, asked the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case because of what they say are conflicting decisions by other courts regarding religious freedom.
And in related cases, Freshway Foods wins its initial lawsuit, and Cornerstone University – one of the schools I attended – adds its own lawsuit.

On Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2013, Cornerstone University joins Dordt College in filing a federal lawsuit against the Obama administration unconstitutional mandate that employers – including religious ones – provide insurance coverage that facilitates access to drugs that can induce abortions. – See more at: http://www.cornerstone.edu/details.aspx?p=19E2931D85131112&ppid=56597&naid=EBD15E2C1F34E07C#sthash.h04UvDbg.dpuf

Passion Ethics

This week: a step in the right direction for the home-schooling parental rights story I featured a few weeks ago, abortion as a failure to love, and a religious freedom story that is really more and needs our prayers.

Wunderlich Children Returned on Condition of School Attendance – HSLDA

Abortion and the Negation of Love – Joe Carter (Gospel Coalition)

Free Saeed: A Wife’s plea to Iran’s President – Nahgmeh Abedini (Desiring God)
An Open Letter from Billy Graham – Samaritan’s Purse
As Graham’s letter notes, Saeed is a U.S. citizen, which raises not only religious freedom issues, but also international relations issues, and the ethical question of why our government isn’t doing more to bring Saeed home.